I Know Why the Media is so Angry
Has it
occurred to the media that if we had gotten Mitt Romney in 2012 we wouldn’t
have Trump now? And Romney was a
candidate who took the Russians very seriously.
Ruth
Marcus, a columnist for the Washington Post perfectly illustrates why I
discount the veracity of modern journalists.
Marcus refers to a need to ignore “Obama-era foibles.” This is a
dismissive and manipulative way of brushing off Attorney General, Loretta Lynch’s
instruction to Comey to down-play the active investigation of Hillary Clinton
by calling it a “matter” instead of using the correct word “investigation.” Comey, whom Marcus says should be taken at
his word, said it made him “queasy.” But
Marcus also wants us to dismiss this part of Comey’s sworn testimony, which
doesn’t fit her bias, while treating the rest of it like Gospel. And that is the part of the media that I
despise.
The fact is
Trump treated Comey the same way he would have treated the head of legal
affairs in his corporation. None of this
gives the President a pass. In doing so,
he may have committed obstruction of justice and not knowing the lay of the
land does not excuse him. It is his job
to learn the law and abide by it.
But if
Trump must be held to a specific standard, so does everyone else.
I voted for
Clinton, but that was simply a choice between projectile vomiting or explosive diarrhea. Given
two fatally flawed candidates I went with intelligence over bullying. Trump should never have been President and I
hope he resigns before this term is over.
But I don’t give any pass to the left-leaning media that played a
significant role in getting Trump to the Oval Office.
The press
tacitly boosted Trump throughout the primaries and thought they were pulling a
great wool over everyone’s eyes. On November 8th, they were hoist on
their own petard.
According
to the New York Times Trump got almost $2 Billion dollars in free air time from
the press during the primaries. Compare that to the next highest number for
free exposure which was $214 Million.
That coverage belonged to Jeb Bush, a moderate candidate who speaks
fluent Spanish and knows both domestic and international issues by the
book. So why did a qualified candidate
like Bush get about 1/10th as much press coverage as Trump? Because the press didn’t want a qualified
candidate facing Clinton.
CNN led the
pack in free Trump coverage during the primaries. From CNN he received 54% of all Republican news
coverage. MSNBC mentioned him 50% of the
time. Fox trailed the pack but still
made him the focus 47% of the time. By
contrast, Bush and Rubio shared 10% each and the rest of the candidates were in
single digits.
Evidently,
you get what you pay for.
Trump got
twice (!!!) the amount in free publicity as was paid for during the most
expensive Presidential campaign in history (Romney/Obama in 2012). The press, in their hubris, thought they were
just “gaming” the average American. They
thought they had pulled the ultimate con on people they assumed to be the
ignorant unwashed. No wonder the left
leaning press is so angry. In their
minds, they have been duped by the minions they thought they controlled.
The media
better reserve their anger for themselves.
They did as much to foist this man on us as the DNC who decided that the
only people one can properly dislike, discount and abuse are blue-collar, straight,
White males.
I’m not on
anybody’s side, but I keep the faith.
Comments