Valtentine's Day and the Science of the Egg and Sperm
Let me establish that I am a romantic. I can recite entire scenes from Now, Voyager which is proof of concept. That being said, I have long thought that
modern love is long on social maneuvering and short—painfully short—on
science.
Since the answer to the question
“Which came first, the chicken or the egg?” is the egg, we will start there.
An egg is a biologically
expensive piece of equipment. It is
large. Not only is the egg energy rich
but the factory and delivery systems are equally resource heavy. Eggs are costly to maintain and in
relatively short supply. That makes them
valuable. There have been technical
studies (very technical—you may read them if you wish, but you will enjoy this
synopsis much better) comparing the gonad biomass and energy that it takes to
produce eggs and sperm. The difference
is incredible. To produce sperm (that
includes the entire delivery system—hook, line and sinker so to speak) it takes
the body about 0.1% of energy available from basal metabolism. Eggs cost the body a whopping 3000 times more
energy than sperm! That makes them
expensive, rare and valuable. Eggs are
the diamonds of biological evolution!
In nature that shows itself in
females who, valuing their “3000-a-pop” eggs, insist on males who prove they
are strong, healthy, and good providers.
Granted, some of those proofing sessions end up on the Animal Planet as
two bulls dusting it up in the meadow, but evidence must be provided. Those females on Animal Planet don’t seem the
least bit interested in males who don’t measure up. Neither do they care if the other females
tease them about being without a mate.
If they can’t get the best, they will happily go without. This attitude is oddly reminiscent of a
maiden aunt of mine who, when asked at a wedding shower if she regretted never
marrying, confidently replied “It takes a mighty good man to beat none at
all.”
If eggs are costly, where does
that leave sperm? How do you rank if the
body creates you out of its loose change?
If eggs are diamonds what are sperm?
Agates, maybe. They are certainly
not worthless. Necessary in fact. But the difference between diamonds and agates
is in how you spend them. Unfortunately,
modern culture seems to want women to treat their diamonds the same way men
treat their marbles—agates I mean. Mistake!
Women have a rare and expensive
commodity which should be shared with a select few. Men have agates that can be gambled on any
game of chance. But what happened? The feminist movement took a real walk in the
weeds when it decided that “liberation” meant that women should behave sexually
the same way men do. Ladies! Why ape a lesser ape?
I was part of the feminist
movement at the beginning. I thought we
were working hard on equal pay and equal job opportunities. Instead we ended up advocating casual and
random sexual involvement. Unfortunately, there was lots of support for the
later, and an equal and opposite amount of resistance for the former. Society took the easy route and here we are.
This is not about Valentine’s
Day. This is about teaching our
daughters to analyze every young man from a lofty point of view. This
man needs me much more than I need him. Does
he have 3000 times more value in brains, discipline and work ethic than all
other men? I am the diamond in this
relationship. What does this agate bring
to the table?
Love is sweet, but science seals
the deal.
Comments