Fifty Years of Planet of the Apes



It has been 50 years since Planet of the Apes was distributed.  Fifty years since a hoarse, half-naked, unshaven Charlton Heston growled “Keep your stinking paws off me you damned dirty apes!”  This movie, designed as an income producing sci-fi, turned into a cultural touchstone.  It has produced seven sequels.  But, most of all, it starred a naked Charlton Heston. 
            I rarely get ga-ga over actors, but Heston rumples my underwear.  [He joins a very select group that includes only three other Hollywood types: Kirk Douglas, Claude Akins and Raymond Burr.  I guess I like faces with character. But I digress.]   In Planet of the Apes, Heston is an astronaut who crash lands on a futuristic planet where talking, thinking, philosophizing apes are the ruling order and humans are slaves.  At the end of the movie, in a truly “Twilight Zone” moment of irony, he discovers that the planet of the apes is really future Earth.   
            Of course, the sequels and the collateral damage that comes from popularity have taken their toll.  Take the 2011 release of Rise of the Planet of the Apes.  Here we have all those angry apes on a rampage, riding horses over the Golden Gate bridge, hell bent for leather and mayhem.  Evidently, if you genetically modify apes, pissing them off in the process, they saddle up.  [By the way, isn’t going in to battle on horseback a little like bringing a knife to a gun fight? But I digress.]
Prior to the release of the movie, Dr. Francis Collins, director of the National Institutes of Health, ruled that “…most use of chimpanzees for invasive medical research no longer can be justified—and that strict new limits should determine which experiments are important enough to outweigh the moral cost of involving this species that is so like us.”  Evidently, cancer, diabetes, Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s have all been cured, there is now free time for the NIH to worry about our primate kin.   There is even current talk about giving apes legal status. [Bringing to mind the sight of a chimp filing a decree of separation from its designated mate.  But I digress.]
            There are a few things that need to be clarified here.  First, chimps and humans do share 96% if their DNA.  Darwin was on to something. That means that there is much we can and have learned by using chimps for scientific research.  However, they are also large, expensive and potentially dangerous animals (even if you don’t give them superhuman intelligence and English saddles).  For these and many other reasons experimenting on chimps has been limited and dwindling to the point of rare, all without policy pronouncements.  Some things simply die a natural death and experimenting with chimps is one of those things. 
Since I try to be both a realist and only minimally hypocritical, I will say that I think medical and scientific research should be done only sparingly on animals.  It should be done when needed, and with a sense of human decency.  Obviously, the closer a living creature approaches a human countenance, the more human decency I want shown.  [Have you noticed that we don’t want chimps, puppies or cute little bunnies used in testing, but we don’t seem to give a crap about frogs, worms and beetles?  Is it life we respect or just cute life?  Darn, I’m digressing again!]
So now we are 50 years away from Planet of the Apes.  A money maker turned into a cult.  Apes are on our ethical radar and Charlton Heston rests gentle on my mind. 
Think light and keep the faith. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Generation of Serfs

  On October 25, 1415, Henry V of England laid some serious hurt on the French at the Battle of Agincourt at Pas-de-Calais, France.   Part of the success of this campaign was due to Henry’s use of the longbow, but part of it also goes to the creative use of military indentures.   These legal contracts required all the English captains to provide specified amounts of men, material and time to the King’s cause.             An indenture was a document, written in duplicate and then torn along a jagged line, like little teeth ( dents ), in the paper.   One portion of the contract was in possession of each party and when the required conditions and period of service were fulfilled, the parts reunited, and the debt was considered paid.   Many of the people who first came to this country from England came as indentured servants, worked off their debt and became the backbone of the country.             Today we are creating a nation not of indentured servants, someone with a carefully
Read more

Our Beautiful Constitution and its Ugly Opponents

 The Constitution is our anchor of stability in a turbulent world!   We can withstand a bad President and a petulant Congress (for the short term, at least) because our Constitution both guides and limits.   If someone asked me to provide proof of a loving God, I would simply ask them how else so many geniuses in the matter of human governance could have been clustered together in the right time and place to create both our country and the means to govern it.    Our founding fathers had the vision to devise a way to not only govern themselves, but govern a country that they could not imagine, yet believed would prevail. The constitution of the United States is like a good parent.   It has allowed us to grow up as we have grown older, with the result that the United States of America is the oldest living democracy in the world.   The miracle of this document is that it lives, breathes and moves with the times.   The three branches of our government work together while standing alone
Read more

Kennewick Man, Columbus Day and History's Judgement

  Nine thousand years ago a man died along the Columbia River.  About 40 years old, he stood 5 feet 7 inches tall and his 160 pounds were all lean, compact strength.  He was no stranger to injury.  In his life, he had skull injuries, 5 broken ribs and a spear point lodged in his pelvic bones.  In each case, he recovered, which means he had someone to care for him.  At the time of his death, cause unknown, he was buried with dignity.               He is called Kennewick Man.  He came to North America long before the peoples currently called Native Americans arrived.  DNA evidence proves he is not related to them.  If there is a real, “first” American, it is this man, most closely related to two far flung groups: Polynesians and the Ainu of Japan.  If you are a Native American, and think you have an historic right of ownership to North America, look over your shoulder.  Kennewick man not only predates you, but he did not even come via the Berengia land bridge.  He is part of a seafar
Read more