Lyndon B. Johnson and the Civil Rights Act
There is a picture of
President Lyndon B. Johnson preparing to sign the Civil Rights Act on July 2,
1964 at History.com. Johnson is seated
in front of probably 80 political and civil rights leaders. Look at the body language of the group. Look at their faces. The tension in that room is still palpable
these 52 years later. There isn’t a
smile in the bunch. People are seated in
closed, legs crossed positions with hands clasped tight in their laps. Many heads are down. There are only three people looking directly
at President Johnson: Lady Bird (in red, God bless her) is on the far left, and
Senators Everett Dirksen (R-Illinois) and Hubert Humphrey (D-Minnesota) both of
whom guided the bill through the Senate are seated in the center.
This momentous moment was not accompanied with
jubilation. The bill had been born—in
large part—of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. Kennedy had made passage of the bill one of
the key parts of his 1960 campaign.
Since Kennedy neither trusted nor wanted much association with Johnson
he had appointed him chairman of the President’s Committee on Equal Employment
Opportunities. This might sound complimentary
but it was, in fact, brilliant political theater. If the bill failed, Johnson (a southerner and
a Texan) would be given the blame. If it
succeeded dissenters would be told to blame Johnson. Of course, the assassination changed the entire
dynamic. To the shock of many, President
Lyndon Johnson said that Kennedy’s Civil Rights Act would not only continue it
would be passed.
Johnson
was a disciplined old school politician.
He had been in the Senate long enough to know how it worked. Both sides made compromises. No one got everything they wanted, but they
all got something. Everyone felt they had drawn some concession from the other
side. Everyone had skin in the
game. It was just a beginning. Everyone knew it, but they also knew that it
was a step that needed taking.
Nor was there any lack of cynicism in creating this
landmark legislation. Johnson’s comment
to Democratic colleagues after signing the bill was “We have just guaranteed
the Negro vote for the next 100 years.”
It wasn’t altruism incarnate, but it was the right law. If what you want is purity, go into
theology. Washington makes sausage.
A half a century later, we have seen a terrible warping
of the message of the Civil Rights Act.
Instead of equal opportunity we see politicians touting Black
privilege. Instead of raising people out
of poverty we see welfare in all its forms being used as a sop for votes. Instead of better education we see standards
being lowered and indoctrination being used like a chapter out of the communist
playbook.
I believe the somber expressions on the faces of those
present when the Civil Rights Bill was signed were because they knew of the
danger for abuse. None of them were
cockeyed optimists. They saw humanity as
it is, not in some utopian fantasy. For
all of that, there was the hope for change.
The time, the bill and the goal were right. They knew that future opportunists might
hijack the process but could not hijack the intent.
We truly need to get back to the intent of the Civil
Rights Act which is equal opportunity.
For those who may have drunk too much of that far left Kool-Aid that
does not mean the right to first place.
It means the right to try, the right to fail, and the right to succeed
or not as one’s talents dictate.
Keep that faith.
Comments