A Contrast is Style: Parenting and Education
We were having some repair work done on our motor home in San Antonio a while back,
and had to take our meals out. As a
result, we had both breakfast and lunch at two separate diners. Nothing fancy, just food. In both cases we ended up sitting at a booth
next to a young mother, her toddler and two older women who could have been
siblings or friends. One child was a
boy, the other a girl. Both were clean
and well cared for. Both were about the
same age and both were Hispanic. In both
cases, we were eating in blue collar neighborhoods where money was not missing,
but dear.
As both
meals progressed, it became evident that the two children were surrounded by
two entirely different types of parents.
The baby girl (at breakfast) was talked to and played with by the women
with her. She smiled and interacted with
all of them. The boy (at lunch) received
food and minimal attention, but the women were busy talking among themselves in
some of the coarsest, rudest, most common language I have heard. The, “f” word seemed to be used as a regular
mark of punctuation. The women had no
regard for the people around them, or the impression they were making on the
young mind at the table.
Being a
member of a minority or being poor had nothing to do with how these women
behaved, or how their children were being raised. It was simply a matter of choice. One parent was choosing to be an attentive
and well-behaved role model; the other parent was choosing to behave like a
slut. What will be the effect of both
styles of parenting when these children start their first year at pre-school?
As a retired teacher/principal/college
educator, I have never voted against a tax increase for education, and I never
will. But, I wish the people wanting
more money for schools would be equally as willing to tell voters the truth
about education. Schools can’t put in
what parents have left out—at least not in a timely fashion. Too many liberals want to blame lack of funds
for lack of educational success and stop the discussion there. They refuse to tell parents that what they do
with their children during the first 5 years of life make school success or
failure almost a given.
There is now a new study of old
research that points out that how much and how often a mother talks with her
children in the first seven months of their life has a direct relationship to
that child’s success in the early years of school. I wrote about the original research of this
phenomenon in the first edition of my book, Beating
the Bell Curve, in 1999.
In too many homes the conditions of a rich learning
environment are not available. People
blame this problem on lack of money, lack of education, lack of social will,
and all the rest of the usual suspects.
But the problem is that when all of the reasons are rounded up and the
appropriate blame placed on each of their shoulders the prime suspect is still
standing, surrounded by a polite politically correct silence. The key part of
the equation is the child’s parents. No
matter how tired, how pressed for time and weighed down by stress, it is the
responsibility of every parent to raise their child.
We have an obligation to support
good schools. Why don’t we also have an
obligation to tell mothers the truth about how they are raising their
children?
Speak up for education and keep the
faith.
Comments