Voter I.D. and One Man/One Vote


It is a few weeks before Christmas and my husband and I were making some last minute shopping stops before heading home to settle into uninterrupted rest and football time.  It included the hardware store, because that makes Tom happy, and the liquor store, because that makes me happy.  We picked up some bourbon (also for Tom), some scotch (for me) and joined the line at the cash register.  That is where I go a short lesson in voting equality. 

In the very long line at the register of that south Texas liquor store there were both men and women.  There were lots of Latinos, a few blacks, at least one Asian and my husband and I.  We were there along with a few other, “Winter Texans” who all look as white and mid-western as a ‘50’s sitcom.   Here is the instructive part:  person after person who came up to the two working cash registers handed over a credit card to pay for their purchases, and every one of them was asked to show a photo I. D.  And guess what?  They all did!  No drama, no complaints, just show the I. D., run the charge card, pay for the liquor and leave.  Merry Christmas!

            If no one gets upset about showing an I.D. to buy liquor, why are certain factions so upset about showing an I.D. to vote?  Isn’t voting more important that buying liquor?  Shouldn’t we guard our one vote more carefully than our whiskey?

            Neither is the need for an I. D. unusual, or the crafty machinations of some nefarious legislature.  Over a quarter of our states require a photo I. D. to vote.  Of these states, all allow you to vote a provisional ballot if you don’t have an I. D. but can meet other criteria. Some states require an I. D., but it does not have to have a photo.  That leaves a handful of states with no voter I. D. laws at all.  I presume you do have to register to vote in these states.  But there evidently is no problem with someone registering, coming to vote, saying they are me and voting.  No proof necessary.  Rinse and repeat. 

            The fact is, there is little voter fraud in this country compared to the number of voters, or (more shamefully) the number of non voters.  The problem is that when voter fraud occurs it is done with the specific hope of subverting our democratic process.  It is also meant to be disruptive, illegal and to thwart the precious right of each of us.  One man, one vote is a grand principle.  No matter how rich, how well known, or how much free press you get because you are one of the beautiful people of Hollywood, you only have one vote.  Period. 

            Do not tell me that getting an I. D. is too difficult.  Isn’t voting worth a little time and effort?  Do not tell me that it intimidates certain people.  If you have done nothing wrong, you have nothing to fear.  Do not tell me it costs too much.  Most states have ways to get free photo I. D.  I would support the same.  Do not tell me you are opposed to photo I. D. laws.  I will automatically assume that you are trying to fraudulently influence election outcomes—and I would be right. 

            Guard the right to vote, and keep the faith.

Comments

Janet ForLife said…
You know, you would think that the government would WANT people to be able to prove who they are in order to make voting FAIR. But I guess we can't expect the government to want things to be fair.
December 15, 2013 at 6:51 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Generation of Serfs

  On October 25, 1415, Henry V of England laid some serious hurt on the French at the Battle of Agincourt at Pas-de-Calais, France.   Part of the success of this campaign was due to Henry’s use of the longbow, but part of it also goes to the creative use of military indentures.   These legal contracts required all the English captains to provide specified amounts of men, material and time to the King’s cause.             An indenture was a document, written in duplicate and then torn along a jagged line, like little teeth ( dents ), in the paper.   One portion of the contract was in possession of each party and when the required conditions and period of service were fulfilled, the parts reunited, and the debt was considered paid.   Many of the people who first came to this country from England came as indentured servants, worked off their debt and became the backbone of the country.             Today we are creating a nation not of indentured servants, someone with a carefully
Read more

Our Beautiful Constitution and its Ugly Opponents

 The Constitution is our anchor of stability in a turbulent world!   We can withstand a bad President and a petulant Congress (for the short term, at least) because our Constitution both guides and limits.   If someone asked me to provide proof of a loving God, I would simply ask them how else so many geniuses in the matter of human governance could have been clustered together in the right time and place to create both our country and the means to govern it.    Our founding fathers had the vision to devise a way to not only govern themselves, but govern a country that they could not imagine, yet believed would prevail. The constitution of the United States is like a good parent.   It has allowed us to grow up as we have grown older, with the result that the United States of America is the oldest living democracy in the world.   The miracle of this document is that it lives, breathes and moves with the times.   The three branches of our government work together while standing alone
Read more

"You Didn't Build That:" Part I

Late in the day on Friday, July 13 th , President Obama mounted the stage of Historic Firehouse Number One in Roanoke , Virginia .   The room held around 800 people but it was hot and several people fainted.   In front of a carefully screened group of supporters he gave one of the most important speeches of his reelection campaign.    It was not meant to be a major speech.   That will come in the even more carefully scripted Convention Hall in Charlotte , North Carolina this September in front of adoring media and rabid political supporters.   But this speech in Roanoke is crucial to the 2012 election because on Friday, in Virginia , President Obama went off message.   Whether through error or hubris, he abandoned his script and spoke off the cuff.   And in so doing, he showed us the man behind the curtain.   The angry but controlled, insecure yet charismatic, market fearful, socialistically inclined man that Barrack Obama really is. I am speaking, of course, of the now famou
Read more