A Before and After Moment
My book club will be
discussing The Passage by Justin
Cronin in November. This book is a well
written and intriguing example of post-apocalyptic science fiction. The
Passage examines what happens when an unexpected, “effect” proceeds from a
well-intentioned, “cause.”
There have been other, “before and after” moments in
history, and I wonder if we are approaching one now.
The
Toba Catastrophe is such a time. About
70,000 years ago Mount Toba , a super volcano in Indonesia , destroyed itself in an
eruption of truly Biblical proportions.
The debris Toba ejected into the upper levels of the atmosphere altered
not just the climate, but the population of this world. This eruption brought about a decade long,
“volcanic winter.”
The result of this entire climatic catastrophe was a
serious die-off of our evolving human species.
Mankind was reduced to less than 10,000 members—literally on the edge of
extinction. The result of this
bottleneck shows a mitochondrial and Y chromosome DNA convergence that implies
limited mating pairs. Humans are
amazingly similar in our DNA because of this before and after event.
The Bubonic Plague of the 14th century reduced
Europe ’s population by at least half. But in its aftermath it also introduced a
period of prosperity. Those who
survived had more food, a higher protein diet (absolutely essential for brain
growth) and increased wages. As health,
money and mental acuity grew, so did a middle class that challenged the
mindless authority of both the church and feudal society. Modern society grew because of this before
and after event.
The crossing of the Atlantic Ocean
and visualization of a circular and singular world, the Industrial Revolution,
the atomic and computer age are all before and after events. They all came with a high price, but they
have each brought us a better life.
It amazes me that our luck has never run out.
In 2010 synthetic cells of living tissue were made for
the first time. Three years later, bio-tech
companies can make up to 1500 new life-forms a day, punching directions into a computer that synthesizes them in
an adjoining lab. They make biological
fuels, medicines, dyes and cosmetics. Jack
Newman, chief scientist for bio-tech leader, Amyris, is quoted in the Washington Post as saying, “You can now
build a cell the same way you can build an app for your iPhone.” This means that the nerdy looking guy working
the iPad at the football game could have just created Soylent Green.
I don’t believe in Cronin’s monstrous mutants; but, I do
believe that life obeys three laws: eat, don’t be eaten, and pass on your
DNA. If you create a life form,
especially one as simple as yeast, you can not imagine how it might interact
with other life forms. These synthetics could
be the beginning of green technology.
They might save rain forests and all those disgusting frogs, or they
might be the unplanned end of grass based grains. They could mean mass produced malaria
vaccines, or the creation of a bug we can’t even imagine.
There are no regulatory means to deal with this new
life. But all swords cut both ways. What is made good can also be made bad. The fact that we can do something does not
mean we should do something, at least not without looking at all the possible, “afters.” I am a lover of science, even knowledge for
the sake of knowledge. But I also
believe that a sound, defensible and consistent set of ethics should be part of
all macro decision.
Think about before and after, and keep the faith.
Comments