"Don't Hate Me Because I'm 1% Beautiful."


Arthur Brooks, President of the American Enterprise Institute, published an article in the Washington Post that brought home a dose of reality about class hatred.  He asks, “Do you hate the 1%?  Do you think they are evil blood suckers?  Well, if you are making $34,000 or more YOU are part of the world’s 1%.   This country has 5% of the world’s population but has 50% of the world’s 1%-ers.  And if you make $34K you are one of them.”  If you earn $34,000/year you are part of the world’s 1%.  If you are also one of the simpletons who think the 1% are worthy of contempt, derision and threat, then you are calling down a curse on your own head.   How does it feel to be hated because you are beautiful?

            In the United States, the 1% is swimming in a smaller and much healthier pond.  Still, the numbers are probably smaller than you might think.  If you want to be part of the 1% in this country you need a yearly income of $380,000.  That includes a lot of double income families who know they are as middle class as they come.  If you are talking about net worth instead of income (homes, financial instruments, property) the numbers become more impressive.   To be part of the 1% in net worth, you have to have accumulated almost 7 million dollars worth of, “stuff.” 

            Parenthetically, my husband and I are retired school teachers.  I have never seen even half of the $380,000/year required of the 1%.  You might think I do not have a dog in this fight, but I do.  I love rich people.  They are my constant hope for a better life; if not for me, then for my family.  If you make your money legally, I don’t care how much you make.  When the owner of Mystic Pizza made a success of his business, invested his money in AAA rated debt in Chile, and turned that into $1.5 million in ten years, he became an American success story, not a villain.   A blessing on his head! 

            That brings me to today’s news.  The Senate has passed its first budget in four years.  Excluding the votes of four pusillanimous Democrat senators that know a, “yea” vote would hurt their chances for re-election next year, the budget passed 50-49.  [Do Senators Baucus of Montana; Begich of Alaska; Hagan of North Carolina and Pryor of Arkansas actually think this thin pretense will not be seen for what it is by their voters?]  The Senate plan calls for $1 trillion in new taxes.  It says it will do this by closing tax breaks for the wealthy.  The Democrats are not defining the word, “wealthy.”  Make no mistake, sooner or later, if you can afford the computer you are reading this on, the word, “wealthy” will include you.

Actually, I think the goal of this administration is to use the word, “wealthy” as a pejorative, directed toward anyone not on the government dole. 

            Consider this, if you compare the income of a small business entrepreneur and a governmental executive of equal influence, the governmental employee will make 17% more.  The government bureaucrat risks nothing, he dares nothing, he creates nothing, but he makes more money.  This is not only wrong, it is dangerous.  Yet this administration is not cutting the bureaucrats, it is cutting the rank and file in this sequester because that makes better theater.   As always with this administration, style over substance.

            Respect success, cut the budget and keep the faith. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Generation of Serfs

  On October 25, 1415, Henry V of England laid some serious hurt on the French at the Battle of Agincourt at Pas-de-Calais, France.   Part of the success of this campaign was due to Henry’s use of the longbow, but part of it also goes to the creative use of military indentures.   These legal contracts required all the English captains to provide specified amounts of men, material and time to the King’s cause.             An indenture was a document, written in duplicate and then torn along a jagged line, like little teeth ( dents ), in the paper.   One portion of the contract was in possession of each party and when the required conditions and period of service were fulfilled, the parts reunited, and the debt was considered paid.   Many of the people who first came to this country from England came as indentured servants, worked off their debt and became the backbone of the country.             Today we are creating a nation not of indentured servants, someone with a carefully
Read more

Our Beautiful Constitution and its Ugly Opponents

 The Constitution is our anchor of stability in a turbulent world!   We can withstand a bad President and a petulant Congress (for the short term, at least) because our Constitution both guides and limits.   If someone asked me to provide proof of a loving God, I would simply ask them how else so many geniuses in the matter of human governance could have been clustered together in the right time and place to create both our country and the means to govern it.    Our founding fathers had the vision to devise a way to not only govern themselves, but govern a country that they could not imagine, yet believed would prevail. The constitution of the United States is like a good parent.   It has allowed us to grow up as we have grown older, with the result that the United States of America is the oldest living democracy in the world.   The miracle of this document is that it lives, breathes and moves with the times.   The three branches of our government work together while standing alone
Read more

"You Didn't Build That:" Part I

Late in the day on Friday, July 13 th , President Obama mounted the stage of Historic Firehouse Number One in Roanoke , Virginia .   The room held around 800 people but it was hot and several people fainted.   In front of a carefully screened group of supporters he gave one of the most important speeches of his reelection campaign.    It was not meant to be a major speech.   That will come in the even more carefully scripted Convention Hall in Charlotte , North Carolina this September in front of adoring media and rabid political supporters.   But this speech in Roanoke is crucial to the 2012 election because on Friday, in Virginia , President Obama went off message.   Whether through error or hubris, he abandoned his script and spoke off the cuff.   And in so doing, he showed us the man behind the curtain.   The angry but controlled, insecure yet charismatic, market fearful, socialistically inclined man that Barrack Obama really is. I am speaking, of course, of the now famou
Read more