The Presidents: Winners and Losers


Today is Presidents’ Day.   I have read 15 presidential biographies and it is my default position when it comes to books or television.  Friends who know this frequently ask me who my favorite President is.  That is a difficult question.  Harry Truman was probably the most likeable.  George Washington was the most admirable, Lincoln the most complex, and Wilson the smartest.   Chester A. Arthur actually earned some grudging admiration from me as a man who rose above his, “political hack” background upon ascending to the Presidency.  He was an example of how the office itself can cause a person to transcend his own weaknesses and rise to the occasion. 

That being said, I am going to devote today to a little study of our Presidents.  The easiest way to tackle this is to group the Presidents by ability.

The top tier of Presidents, which are almost universally acclaimed as indispensible leaders, shapers and saviors of our Union orbit in a rarified atmosphere of their own: George Washington, Abraham Lincoln, Thomas Jefferson, Theodore Roosevelt, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson, and Harry S Truman are all in this, “A” list.  Of these, I consider Theodore Roosevelt to be the most interesting, and his cousin, Franklin, the most overrated.

            The B list includes Presidents also frequently agreed upon as exceptional for their own time, if not all time.  John Adams, James Madison, James Monroe, John Q. Adams, Andrew Jackson, James Knox Polk, Dwight D. Eisenhower, and Lyndon B. Johnson are all in this category.  I consider Adams and Eisenhower to be consistently underrated.  But Lyndon Johnson is my favorite.  He inherited the Viet Nam mess and an unfinished, unfocused Civil Rights movement and used his daunting strength of character to deal with both. 

            The C list is a gray area of meager or questionable accomplishment.  It includes Grover Cleveland, William McKinley, William Howard Taft, Herbert Hoover, John F. Kennedy, Gerald Ford, Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan, and George H. W. Bush.  In this group, it is easy to see a bias toward men who have been out of office long enough to gain historical perspective.  Kennedy was a weak President who gets most of his standing through the emotional investment of his modern era assassination.  It was his decisions that led to our unhappy presence in Viet Nam.  George H. W. Bush keeps rising in popularity as time passes and truth keeps bubbling to the surface. 

            The D list consists of those who may have had some redeeming value, but clearly found the Presidency too much for their nature, mind or morals.  This list includes Martin Van Buren, Zachary Taylor, Ulysses S. Grant, Rutherford B. Hayes, James Garfield, Chester A. Arthur, Benjamin Harrison, Calvin Coolidge, and Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton.

Finally, we have the, “F” list; those absent or deeply flawed men who hurt more than helped their nation.  Some of them never had a chance to show their better selves, others had no better self to show.  William Henry Harrison, John Tyler, Millard Fillmore, Franklin Pierce, James Buchanan, Andrew Johnson, and Warren G. Harding fill this unhappy position.

You may notice that I have left our last two Presidents off this list.  You need time to judge a President, and both George W. Bush and Barack Obama have not had enough of either.  But, not to be called a coward, I will tell you where I think they will end up.  Fifty years from now, George W. Bush will be in the B list, Obama will be in the D list.

Respect the office if not the man, and keep the faith. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Generation of Serfs

  On October 25, 1415, Henry V of England laid some serious hurt on the French at the Battle of Agincourt at Pas-de-Calais, France.   Part of the success of this campaign was due to Henry’s use of the longbow, but part of it also goes to the creative use of military indentures.   These legal contracts required all the English captains to provide specified amounts of men, material and time to the King’s cause.             An indenture was a document, written in duplicate and then torn along a jagged line, like little teeth ( dents ), in the paper.   One portion of the contract was in possession of each party and when the required conditions and period of service were fulfilled, the parts reunited, and the debt was considered paid.   Many of the people who first came to this country from England came as indentured servants, worked off their debt and became the backbone of the country.             Today we are creating a nation not of indentured servants, someone with a carefully
Read more

Our Beautiful Constitution and its Ugly Opponents

 The Constitution is our anchor of stability in a turbulent world!   We can withstand a bad President and a petulant Congress (for the short term, at least) because our Constitution both guides and limits.   If someone asked me to provide proof of a loving God, I would simply ask them how else so many geniuses in the matter of human governance could have been clustered together in the right time and place to create both our country and the means to govern it.    Our founding fathers had the vision to devise a way to not only govern themselves, but govern a country that they could not imagine, yet believed would prevail. The constitution of the United States is like a good parent.   It has allowed us to grow up as we have grown older, with the result that the United States of America is the oldest living democracy in the world.   The miracle of this document is that it lives, breathes and moves with the times.   The three branches of our government work together while standing alone
Read more

"You Didn't Build That:" Part I

Late in the day on Friday, July 13 th , President Obama mounted the stage of Historic Firehouse Number One in Roanoke , Virginia .   The room held around 800 people but it was hot and several people fainted.   In front of a carefully screened group of supporters he gave one of the most important speeches of his reelection campaign.    It was not meant to be a major speech.   That will come in the even more carefully scripted Convention Hall in Charlotte , North Carolina this September in front of adoring media and rabid political supporters.   But this speech in Roanoke is crucial to the 2012 election because on Friday, in Virginia , President Obama went off message.   Whether through error or hubris, he abandoned his script and spoke off the cuff.   And in so doing, he showed us the man behind the curtain.   The angry but controlled, insecure yet charismatic, market fearful, socialistically inclined man that Barrack Obama really is. I am speaking, of course, of the now famou
Read more