Sandy Hook Shooting, Gun Control and the Emotionally Unstable
I am moving back and forth
between rage and tears, fear and sorrow.
The shooting at the Sandy Hook Elementary
School falls too close to my sphere to be viewed
with the sympathetic detachment that generally accompanies these oft-repeated
tragedies. Besides being the
Grandmother of six children, five of whom are in elementary school, I taught
for 30 years in elementary school, eventually becoming a principal. I have had to confront and detain a student
believed to have a gun (thankfully, he did not). But today’s news has brought me to my
emotional knees.
I am willing to bet that a few things will come to light
in a few days:
1.
The killer
will be emotionally unstable with a history of small but escalating violent
episodes.
2.
The family
will be in denial about the severity of all of this.
3.
Medication
will be required but frequently skipped, missed and excused.
4.
There will be
frequent use of violent games, and anti-social, isolating activities—a computer
in a closed room is this guy’s best friend.
The
scenario is too familiar. I’ve had
it. I am now going to step on everyone’s
toes and if you don’t think you can handle it, stop reading and go back to
watching news coverage of 20 babies being cut down by a monster.
First,
we need gun laws in this country that make it much harder for these crazy
people to get the weapons they need for this mass destruction. My father was a champion marksman. Two of my son-in-laws are hunters. I’m fine with all of that. But Canada has lots of hunters and they
don’t have semi-automatic weapons being sold to the mothers of mass
murderers. It isn’t enough to have tough
gun laws (Connecticut
has some of the toughest in the country), we need a ban on the guns designed to
kill people, not animals. And for all of
you who are busy typing out the words, “When guns are outlawed, only outlaws
will have guns.” My answer to that is the better to identify the outlaws. Throw their asses in jail or shoot them on
the spot.
Second
(and here is where I get to offend the other side of the political spectrum)
there are ways to identify the dangerously maladjusted and we need to do that
and then limit their opportunities to commit crimes against humanity. Between genetic markers, observable data and
scientific evaluation it is possible to identify a large number of the people
who are capable of murder. These people
do not appear out of thin air. The first
victim of sociopaths and the few violently inclined schizophrenics are the families
who cover for them and excuse their increasingly heinous acts. For all of you out there who are worried
about violating their rights I will tell you that I just don’t care! There are 27 humans whose rights have been
permanently abrogated. If a person needs
watching, medication or institutionalization I insist that they have it.
Finally,
if we encourage a culture that desensitizes us against violence we had better
expect more of this. Freedom of speech
does not mean exemption from good taste and responsible production. If you make your money producing the games,
movies and, “gangsta” rap that glorifies this carnage you get to share some of
the blame. Shame on all of you.
Have
I offended everyone? Good. We’ve got to do something. The price of doing nothing is too painfully
high.
Some
days it is so hard to keep the faith.
Comments