SAT's Decline, Contraception Thrives
This week, two stories crossed paths in a way I couldn’t get out of my head. First, the SAT exams recorded the sharpest decline in reading scores in four decades and, second, the New York Public Schools decided to widen the scope of their contraceptive program.
Let’s look first at the contraception issue. The schools will not only provide birth control pills, on demand and in secret to girls as young as 14, but they will also provide the, “morning after” pill. There was also serious talk about IUD implantation. They actually had a doctor, with a straight face, talking about how, “dangerous” the pill was, which made the IUD ever so much more advantageous for these young girls. I’m not going to discuss the issue of teen pregnancy and abortion. What needs to be said on that subject has been said. But, when schools talk about providing contraceptive, or abortive possibilities to these girls I want to ask a few questions.
Since
any girl under the age of 18 is legally unable to give sexual consent, are the
sexual partners (criminals, by definition) of these girls being sought out and
charged with rape? These girls have had
their childhood stolen from them and are being sexually exploited by a
relative, teacher, priest, boyfriend or internet scum sucker but no one seems
to care. The schools will mouth a bunch
of platitudes about not wanting to, “intimidate” the girls with difficult
questions, but that simply isn’t true.
What is true is an ugly, self-serving goal. Nobody wants to be financially inconvenienced
with a baby. Sexual exploitation? No
problem. Sexually transmitted disease? No problem.
Rape? No problem. Tampering with the biology of young girls? No problem.
A baby? Now that’s a
problem. The men involved in violating
these girls are blissful. They get to do
what they want with not a shred of legal, moral or financial
responsibility. Why are schools so eager
to protect the men who have sex with underage girls but do nothing to prevent
the act itself?
The
other story was an article in the Washington Post about the reading scores on
the SAT for 2012 being the lowest they have been in forty years. There are a few predictable facts concerning
the SAT’s. Family income is a huge
predictor of how well you do. Asians are
not part of the overall decline. Public
districts that have high academic standards and an energetic staff show
gains.
Those
who would rather excuse than cure try to say that if the wealthy and white do
well on a test it means the test is bad.
They point to every problem of low income families except the
possibility of poor parenting. Of course
that does not explain Asians who succeed despite being immigrant, poor, living
in the inner city and having English as a second language. Nor does it explain the success of Black,
Hispanic and other minority children who succeed because of good parenting in
the face of over whelming poverty and discrimination. Yet, as a country, our academic standards
are failing us.
In the District of Columbia ,
public school students scored nearly 300 points below the national
average. I presume that does not include
scores from the exclusive, Quaker operated, Sidwell Friends
School where the Obama’s
send their girls. That school, and the
families who send their children there, work together for academic success. Good for them! I wonder if those, “high end” parents would see
some problems in their minor children being offered the morning after pill.
Protect
our daughters, and keep the faith.
Comments