Addiction, Babies, Two and a Half Men
Our local paper ran two stories this week that brought me up
short. On Tuesday there was a disturbing
article about the three fold increase in drug dependent babies being born each
year. These babies are born needing
methadone treatment in intensive care for weeks if not months to ease them off
the drug addiction they are born with thanks to their low-life mothers who
deliberately use drugs during pregnancy.
[And do not talk to me about addiction being an illness. Diabetes is an illness; influenza is an
illness; the common cold is an illness.
Drugs are something you choose to use, knowing you should not, knowing
you have been told not to, knowing they are illegal. Drinking, smoking and using drugs are all things
a person makes a conscious decision to do and, indeed, go out of their way to
do. So, no sympathy here.] Even if the sight of these innocent newborns
taking their dose of methadone didn’t make you righteously indignant, the
thought of the money being used to correct the grievous errors of their
profligate mothers might.
One
Wednesday, the same paper ran an article about the increase in the number of
teens who report using pot as often as 20 times per month. It seems that 1 in 10 teens feel the need to
toke up almost every day. This might
explain some problems with grades, lack of book reading, and generally poor
test scores. Marijuana is a gateway drug; no one begins using heroin or cocaine
without starting with marijuana. The
same babies that are born with drug addictions are born to mothers who started
out smoking pot, and probably in their teens.
We also know that the teenage brain, since it is still developing, is
particularly prone to addictions of all kind.
That is why the stinking tobacco companies (and why are these leeches
still getting agricultural subsidies????) market to young people. Who takes up, “the habit” as a 40 year
old?
We have more pot smokers, more
addicted babies, and no one worries about the relationship between these two
facts.
The most
obvious link is the way the entertainment industry is working to legalize
marijuana. I used to like watching Two and a Half Men but I’ve given up on
it in large part because I am disgusted by the weekly references to teen marijuana
use. It isn’t funny, it’s pathetic. Without working too hard I can think of five
other prime time television shows that use pot smoking as a constant joke line,
treating it as a, “given” of modern life.
According to these script writers, the problem doesn’t seem to be
wasting your time, life and health with the mental masturbation of drug use,
the problem is that pot is illegal, therefore interfering with the instant
gratification the characters are so richly entitled to.
Just as the entertainment industry
has decided it can manipulate the population into voting for the politicians of
Hollywood ’s
choice, they also believe they can manipulate us into accepting any morality
they advocate. Maybe they can. Personally, I have a prototype letter on my computer
that I send to all of the advertisers of any television program I find
offensive. It simply states that, while
the writers can produce any story line they like, I can decide which products I
buy, and their product won’t be one of them because I am offended by the
program they align themselves with. I
send it via e-mail or hard copy and it makes me feel better.
Think through your choices, and
keep the faith.
Comments
Personally I think legalizing pot has several benefits. One is the savings on interdiction which does not work. Second, taxing pot would raise lots of money. It can be more controlled the way alcohol is. Finally it cuts down on some of the gang violence associated with this drug.
Today a high school student can score pot in five minutes. With out the help of an adult alcohol is more difficult.
Just a realistic opinion from another conservative.
Bob Copeland