The Scopes Monkey Trial is 93 Years Old




June 10th is the anniversary of the famous trial, Tennessee vs. John Thomas Scopes.  It put the small town of Dayton, Tennessee on the map and gave us a great movie, Inherit the Wind.  Setting that aside, there was plenty of theatrics in the trial itself. 
            In March of 1925 the state of Tennessee had passed the “Butler” act (no relation as far as I can tell or that my husband will attest to) which outlawed the teaching of evolution.  The only story of creation allowed in the God-fearin’ state of Tennessee was what came out of the King James Bible.  
            John Scopes, a substitute science teacher, was recruited by a local businessman, George Rappalyea, to challenge the law.  Scopes later admitted that he couldn’t remember if he ever taught any evolution or not, but the trial had to have a defendant.  What was essentially a purposeful publicity stunt succeeded beyond expectations.  The prosecution enlisted three-times defeated Presidential candidate, William Jennings Bryan (whose elocutionary bombast makes Donald Trump look like starter dough), while the ACLU got Clarence Darrow to defend Scopes.  The press outnumbered the residents of the town.  In the end, Judge Raulston ordered the trial moved outdoors because he feared the weight of the gathered humanity in the old Rhea County Courthouse would collapse the floor!
            The defense tried to put the law on trial.  The judge insisted it was the defendant who was on trial and a judgement of guilty with a nominal fine was handed down.  Since the breaking the law was only a misdemeanor, this was never a case of life or death.  It was much more important than that. 
            Evolution is a fact. 
I am a practicing Lutheran who knows that God created me and all that exists.  I am also an educated person who knows that evolution has occurred on this planet in both macro and microforms.  I also know that the entire universe was probably created almost instantaneously from an incredibly small amount of intensely dense matter in what is frequently referred to as the, “Big Bang.”  There is absolutely no conflict between my religious beliefs and my scientific understanding.  The reason is in the use of the words, “believe” and, “know.” 
Religion is faith based, that is, it is belief in the absence of proof.  To require proof of a religious belief means that you don’t have enough faith to sustain what you profess to be true.  Science, on the other hand, is based on inquiry, empirical evidence, and self-correction.  That which strengthens science—evidence—cheapens faith.  Likewise, what strengthens faith—belief without evidence—discredits science.  The two are mutually exclusive.  There is no conflict.
Evolution is the heart of our biological sciences as well as geology and cosmology.  If you don’t understand evolution you don’t understand why we are now encountering bacteria that are resistant to antibiotics.  If you don’t understand continental drift you don’t know why your insurance rates go up because so many people build on the San Andreas Fault.  If you don’t understand the scientific process you can fall prey to irrational, gullible or false thinking.  These are the people who confuse a google search with a medical degree and don’t vaccinate their children!
Science is the study of the physical nature of our existence.  Evolution is an essential part of science.  Both should be taught aggressively in the schools and put to work in our commerce and industry.  Good science must never be based on faith, and real faith can never be threatened by good science. 
Cognito ergo sum.  I also keep the faith.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Witches in Georgia, Nuts in Texas

Some time ago a woman in Georgia won a restraining order against a man who had been stalking her for months.   She had met him when he answered her advertisement in a singles column.   In the ad she described herself as a, “wiccan” priestess—a witch!   She was then shocked that she didn’t attract an intelligent, emotionally mature male.   Instead she got a weird, obsessive stalker.   Whom did she think she was going to get? I realize that I am probably not being as tolerant as the times require, but it seems to me that any adult who calls herself a witch should not be expected to be taken seriously.   Do adults have to be told that there are no such things as witches?   Didn’t we learn that sometime between the Salem Witch Trials and the dawning of the nuclear age?   What seems to be going on here is that the mantra of tolerance which rightly began as a way to combat institutionalized prejudice has been carried to an extreme that says we can n...
Read more

Is Obama One of Our Four Best Presidents?

My default setting for a good book is a biography, add a penchant for American history and you have someone who reads a lot of Presidential biographies.   I am up to 13 so far, and plan on covering every President before I die, God willing.   Naturally, it caught my attention when President Obama said he would put his administration up with the top four Presidents.                 President Obama was clearly one of those children who were constantly told by his parents and grandparents that he was, “special.”   He was a special person; his parents were special people and everybody else, particularly people who didn’t think he was special, were wrong, jealous and possibly evil.   Such children grow up with an exaggerated sense of self.   We usually only see this syndrome in athletes or Hollywood stars, because politicians have to come up the hard way and there are lots of people to let them know ju...
Read more

Chris Christie and the Young Vampires of the Tea Party

The Tea Party has given this nation a much needed fiscal intervention, but they are like young vampires.   I can best explain this discord with an analogy of Stephanie Meyers’ excellent books advocating teenage chastity.   Meyers wrote the Twilight series of novels about vegetarian vampires who are under siege from vampires who want traditional vampire values.   Traditional vampires want to kill humans by sucking them dry (which is what Democrats feel about successful business people).    Our vegetarian vampires want to live at peace with everyone while simply being left alone to enjoy whatever vampire-like existence they choose (much like Americans in general).    But complicating things to the max are an army of young vampires.   Young vampires are undisciplined, emotional and ready to kill everything, including each other.   Enter the Tea Party.   New to the game, new to the town, and obeying only one overpowering and all con...
Read more