The Long View for Britain and the United States
What are the long term ramifications for the United States,
now that Great Britain has voted to leave the European Union? Despite all the roiling waters and implicit threat
that bodies will come floating to the surface, the long view is the only one
that works for this truly amazing event.
Why amazing? Because the status
quo is very easy to achieve, and very hard to upset. It takes courage to say “been there, done
that, screwed up big time and it’s all on me.”
The first thing we need to know
about the long term is that it will take at least two years for Great Britain
to extricate itself from the EU. Can you
remember what dire, earth shattering crisis was facing the world two years
ago? Didn’t think so.
There have been lots of vague and
general references to what faces all of us because England wanted out, but specifics
are either missing or filled with a string of “ifs.” The Chairman of the Fed, Janet Yellen, has
opined that Britain’s exit would be bad for the US, but she sites only the
temporary chaos in the financial markets.
Other, equally prestigious economists, have offered other views:
a.
There is going to be turmoil in the stock, bond
and commodity markets with the amount of activity seen in descending order
respectively. This will be temporary,
and if you have investment money available, now is your chance to buy low. Personally, I expect an uncertain market through
October, and stability by the first quarter of 2017.
b.
In times of uncertainty, investors look for safe
harbors. The United States is a
notoriously safe place. [Why do you
think some 122 foreign countries house their national gold supplies in the
basement of the New York Federal Reserve Bank? Yes, it actually is there; I’ve seen it.] This country will probably see an influx of
foreign investment dollars as the rest of the world shakes things out.
c.
There is some thought that the rest of the EU may
try to punish the British by limiting or refusing their free trade (there is
something amusing about the bankrupt Greeks trying to put some smack on Great
Britain, but that is not the point of this discussion). That means Great Britain will have to look
for someone else to buy their products (us) and the rest of Europe will have to
find someone to sell them what they won’t get from GB (again, us). And while we are on the subject of trade
agreements. Our clueless asterisk-in-chief
went to England and threatened them with no more United States trade deals if
they didn’t vote to stay in the EU. Well that is just what the undecided voters
needed to hear wasn’t it? Nobody wants a
snooty little no-it-all telling you how to run your own house.
d.
Finally, while there may be some—even many—multi-national
companies that will relocate away from London, that can do nothing but enhance
New York City as a hub of world finance.
What is more, when the dust finally settles (and two years is a pretty
good shake down time for dust) will these companies really want to bet on a
European nation that is bogged down with the debt, socialism and unproductive
policies of its weakest members, or stay with a free, independent Great Britain
that has only one goal—building itself up.
The English are going it alone, a sovereign country again and at last. I wish them well and hope they keep the
faith.
Comments