The Democratic Debate, Men and the Wage Gap
The one take-away I got
from tonight’s Democratic debate was that if you are a woman, an illegal alien
(which, for some reason, the Democrats persist in calling immigrants) or a
member of the LGBT community you are down with the Democratic Party.
The
best I could figure, we are going to provide free education, free health care,
free dope and a get-out-of-jail-free card to everyone who self-selects as an
American. This bill (estimated at $15
trillion dollars a year, by the way) is going to be paid by the ever popular
“…tax on the wealthy.” [Check the
definition of wealthy, by the way, because that means the income of two people,
working 40+ hours a week, and making better than $100K/year. If you are a teacher and your husband a fire
fighter, you are part of the wealthy and better plan on paying for all those
freebies.]
But
I digress.
What I really want to talk about is the one group who
seem to be of absolutely no interest to the people on the CNN stage. I am speaking, of course, about men; the only
group it is still fashionable and acceptable to hate in this country.
Anyone
who reads this blog knows that while I dearly love men I am totally incapable
of understanding them. I am 13 months
away from 70 years old, and the best I have been able to figure out is that a
penis must be a heavy piece of equipment to carry around. But, God bless their complexity, I love
men. That is why it pains me to reveal
the following piece of information.
The
average man, working a full-time job in the middle of the middle income
category earned $50,383 in 2014. The same man in the same job in 1973 was
earning $53,294! Adjusted for
inflation, men’s salaries were higher 40 years ago than they are now! Women, on the other hand, have been working
steadily upward, increasing their wages for middle income jobs by about
30%.
Men,
the group no one on the Democrat stage gave a damn about, are earning
less. I see a problem with that. While I am all for better pay for women—at least
those who deserve better pay—I am not for advancing one group over another for
any reason as superficial as gender.
There are lots of reasons offered for this drop in male
wage earning, though none of them are supported by anything other than popular
conjecture. We do know that US productivity
has doubled since 1973, yet the wages of males have stagnated. We know that some worker compensation was
been coming in the form of benefits, which do not show up as salaries (but
certainly have monetary value). We know
that labor’s share of national income has been declining since 2000, but that
still leaves 27 years of male wage stagnation that are unaccounted for.
Is it possible that male wages are declining because it
is not fashionable to pay top dollar for a man who does a good job? A competent white male certainly doesn’t get
you a federal contract when Congress has mandated a company owned by a
trans-sexual, Native American female with a limp.
I have one question.
When we negotiate treaties with other nations, do they send their best,
or do they send an equal representation of every segment of their population,
whether or not they have one freaking clue?
That’s what I thought.
Are
men going to vote in mass in this election?
Are they going to vote for the party of excellence or the party of accommodation? I hope they keep the faith.
Comments