The Health Care Law, Wickard v. Filburn and Personal Liberty
The Devil always seems to be in the details. But sometimes the Devil telegraphs his punch. There is, in the language of poker players, a, “tell.” We know what he is thinking because of how he holds his cards, or lowers his eyes, or hunches his shoulders. Well, an intelligent person would (and apparently did) pick up the long range dangers inherent in the 1943 Supreme Court decision Wickard v. Filburn . The decision, a precedent for the scope of Federal power, told an Ohio wheat farmer that he could not grow unlimited amounts of wheat on his farm and would be fined for each extra bushel. Let’s boil this down to its basic parts. A man owns his own land, pays for it with his own money, works it with his own effort, grows a legal crop, and is told by the government that he has a limit on how much he can produce because his work affects the cost of the product nationally. ...