King George III and Lessons in Insanity


This is a column about King George III who was King of England before, during and after the American Revolution.  This is not a column about any other human being. 
            The paintings of King George III show a man with puckered, rubbery lips, a supercilious expression, and a pretentious white wig.  Most people with even a passing understanding of American history know that King George was mad as a hatter. 
            Excepting his inability to see the world in a consistently and reliably accurate frame of mind, there are no excuses for George not being able to rule his nation.  He was, after all, born to the purple.  George (like Trump, whom this blog is not about) was of largely German extraction.  Unlike Trump, he was well educated. He also liked science and became an avid gardener.  [The only thing Trump seems to grow is adipose tissue—but this column isn’t about him.]  George was shy, quiet, and raised with a sense of duty.  Careful upbringing did not keep him from wandering into insanity, but at least we know he started on home base. 
            George William Frederick became king at age 22.  He married a year later.  As all royal marriages at that time the woman he would marry was chosen for him and for political reasons.  He wed Charlotte Sophia of Mecklenburg-Strelitz (more German blood, for those of you keeping score) on the same day he met her.  To the credit of both George and Charlotte they were happily married for 50 years and had 15 children. 
            King George certainly gets much of the blame for losing thirteen fractious colonies in North America.  But while he was opposed to “liberty” and “freedom” (two lofty concepts he was not allowed to practice in his own life which was guided by duty, responsibility and marrying the woman you are told to) King George is not the one who pissed off the Colonists.  The British Parliament is the body that passed the Stamp Act of 1765 and the Townshend Act of 1767 which put that pesky tax on tea. 
            While having bouts of clear and easily defined insanity from 1788 onward, George fought back and retained his throne until 1811.  At that time, his disassociation from reality was so consistently apparent that he had to relinquish his crown.  George III died on January 29, 1820.  Whether George’s madness can be attributed to the inherited disease porphyria or the arsenic found in chemical analysis of his hair or some unknown cause, the result was the same.  Even the hide-bound British royalists were able to figure out that crazy in meant crazy out and the King’s rule had to come to an end. 
            Some people are genetically disposed to insanity.  Some have insanity thrust upon them.  Others warp their own thinking by the enthroning of their own ego.  When you create a persona that you know is false, and falsely exalted, you are living a lie.  When you know, in your darkest thoughts and most solitary moments, that people must never know who—or what—you truly are, you give yourself up to insanity.  No one must ever hold the mirror to your own, personal Don Quixote.  You are ever defensive; ever on the run; ever vigilante; ever angry; ever, ever, ever alone.
            Such lost souls can not heal themselves.  They must simply be put in a place where they can not do harm to others. 
            When you recognize insanity you keep your own faith.     

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Generation of Serfs

  On October 25, 1415, Henry V of England laid some serious hurt on the French at the Battle of Agincourt at Pas-de-Calais, France.   Part of the success of this campaign was due to Henry’s use of the longbow, but part of it also goes to the creative use of military indentures.   These legal contracts required all the English captains to provide specified amounts of men, material and time to the King’s cause.             An indenture was a document, written in duplicate and then torn along a jagged line, like little teeth ( dents ), in the paper.   One portion of the contract was in possession of each party and when the required conditions and period of service were fulfilled, the parts reunited, and the debt was considered paid.   Many of the people who first came to this country from England came as indentured servants, worked off their debt and became the backbone of the country.             Today we are creating a nation not of indentured servants, someone with a carefully
Read more

Our Beautiful Constitution and its Ugly Opponents

 The Constitution is our anchor of stability in a turbulent world!   We can withstand a bad President and a petulant Congress (for the short term, at least) because our Constitution both guides and limits.   If someone asked me to provide proof of a loving God, I would simply ask them how else so many geniuses in the matter of human governance could have been clustered together in the right time and place to create both our country and the means to govern it.    Our founding fathers had the vision to devise a way to not only govern themselves, but govern a country that they could not imagine, yet believed would prevail. The constitution of the United States is like a good parent.   It has allowed us to grow up as we have grown older, with the result that the United States of America is the oldest living democracy in the world.   The miracle of this document is that it lives, breathes and moves with the times.   The three branches of our government work together while standing alone
Read more

"You Didn't Build That:" Part I

Late in the day on Friday, July 13 th , President Obama mounted the stage of Historic Firehouse Number One in Roanoke , Virginia .   The room held around 800 people but it was hot and several people fainted.   In front of a carefully screened group of supporters he gave one of the most important speeches of his reelection campaign.    It was not meant to be a major speech.   That will come in the even more carefully scripted Convention Hall in Charlotte , North Carolina this September in front of adoring media and rabid political supporters.   But this speech in Roanoke is crucial to the 2012 election because on Friday, in Virginia , President Obama went off message.   Whether through error or hubris, he abandoned his script and spoke off the cuff.   And in so doing, he showed us the man behind the curtain.   The angry but controlled, insecure yet charismatic, market fearful, socialistically inclined man that Barrack Obama really is. I am speaking, of course, of the now famou
Read more