The EPA, Land Grabs and Gina McCarthy


I am sure that Regina, “Gina” McCarthy is a nice person, but she is also everything that goes wrong when you mistake a resume for talent and a bureaucrat for a leader.  A bureaucrat is always a follower, and the party line that McCarthy is following is a land grab of preposterous, dangerous proportions.  What irritates me is that this presumably nice person sees absolutely nothing wrong with proposing legislation that would take your backyard carp pond and put it under governmental ownership. 

            First, there are a few things you need to know about McCarthy.  She is the kind of person that the Obama administration both seeks out and loves at first sight.  This woman has never held a real job in her life!  Her college credentials are in soft sciences—social anthropology, environmental health engineering and public policy.  Geez-oh-man, with degrees this mushy, this woman hasn’t had to cram for a final in her life.   These are the kinds of degrees that you get by pontificating, bull-shitting and spouting neo-chic group think on a test.  If the professor doesn’t have the foggiest idea what you have said, but agrees with your biases you are declared an, “A” student.  I wouldn’t want this woman as my bridge partner, let alone my EPA administrator. 

            With her limited academic credentials it is obvious that McCarthy never worked at anything outside of environmental desk jobs.  She took her mantra of, “…green good; business bad…” from state to federal offices right up the line.  McCarthy has now reached the top of all bureaucratic boondoggles, the head of the Environmental Protection Agency. 

            On Tuesday, March 25, this unimaginative but malleable administrator proposed a change to the Clean Water Act which would give the government regulatory control over temporary (!!!) wetlands.  The EPA would apply pollution regulations to, “intermittent and ephemeral streams and wetlands.”  That means any hog wallow that gets muddy during a good rain.  McCarthy says that such transient surface water is part of the, “…waters of the United States” as if there is a kind of royal custody here.

Most land owners would say that the water that fills the run-off ditch in their back yard five days a year is just water, busy seeking its own level.  But McCarthy sees that water as part of a master plan.  She wants the government to exercise control of your conduct around that ditch, pond, sluice or mud puddle.  I guess there will be no more peeing in the creek—please make sure the cows know that.

            Sen. David Vitter (R-Louisiana), top Republican on the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, says this rule, “…may be one of the most significant private property grabs in the U.S. history.”

            Never mind that the United States Supreme Court ruled in 2001 and 2006 that water controlled by the EPA must be, “relatively permanent or continuously flowing and sizeable, like "oceans, rivers, streams and lakes."  McCarthy and the EPA minions decided that the court rulings made administration too complex and confusing.  This proposal circumnavigates both the legislative and judicial branches of the government so the executive can do that voodoo that they do so well.

            The ultimate intent is clear.  Big brother will take control of your land and administer it as they see fit.   

            This proposal is now subject to a 90 day, “comment” period.  I hope the comments are forth coming and frank in condemnation of this attempt at turning our private lands into fiefdoms of the central government. 

            Protect the rights of private land owners and keep the faith.  

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Our Beautiful Constitution and its Ugly Opponents

 The Constitution is our anchor of stability in a turbulent world!   We can withstand a bad President and a petulant Congress (for the short term, at least) because our Constitution both guides and limits.   If someone asked me to provide proof of a loving God, I would simply ask them how else so many geniuses in the matter of human governance could have been clustered together in the right time and place to create both our country and the means to govern it.    Our founding fathers had the vision to devise a way to not only govern themselves, but govern a country that they could not imagine, yet believed would prevail. The constitution of the United States is like a good parent.   It has allowed us to grow up as we have grown older, with the result that the United States of America is the oldest living democracy in the world.   The miracle of this document is that it lives, breathes and moves with the times.   The three branches of our government work together while standing alone
Read more

A Generation of Serfs

  On October 25, 1415, Henry V of England laid some serious hurt on the French at the Battle of Agincourt at Pas-de-Calais, France.   Part of the success of this campaign was due to Henry’s use of the longbow, but part of it also goes to the creative use of military indentures.   These legal contracts required all the English captains to provide specified amounts of men, material and time to the King’s cause.             An indenture was a document, written in duplicate and then torn along a jagged line, like little teeth ( dents ), in the paper.   One portion of the contract was in possession of each party and when the required conditions and period of service were fulfilled, the parts reunited, and the debt was considered paid.   Many of the people who first came to this country from England came as indentured servants, worked off their debt and became the backbone of the country.             Today we are creating a nation not of indentured servants, someone with a carefully
Read more

Kennewick Man, Columbus Day and History's Judgement

  Nine thousand years ago a man died along the Columbia River.  About 40 years old, he stood 5 feet 7 inches tall and his 160 pounds were all lean, compact strength.  He was no stranger to injury.  In his life, he had skull injuries, 5 broken ribs and a spear point lodged in his pelvic bones.  In each case, he recovered, which means he had someone to care for him.  At the time of his death, cause unknown, he was buried with dignity.               He is called Kennewick Man.  He came to North America long before the peoples currently called Native Americans arrived.  DNA evidence proves he is not related to them.  If there is a real, “first” American, it is this man, most closely related to two far flung groups: Polynesians and the Ainu of Japan.  If you are a Native American, and think you have an historic right of ownership to North America, look over your shoulder.  Kennewick man not only predates you, but he did not even come via the Berengia land bridge.  He is part of a seafar
Read more