Dinosaurs, DNA and Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom


Full disclosure: Hollywood is not going to make money off my two or three movies a year attendance.  But when I do go to the cinema I want to be entertained with action adventure movies.  I grew up on movies like The Vikings. [And what was Janet Leigh thinking, preferring pasty faced Tony Curtis over that hunk, Kirk Douglas?]   John Wayne is my hero and I am still waiting for Frank Sinatra to finally make that damn train in Von Ryan’s Express!   
With this history (Jennifer Aniston, take note, there is not a romantic comedy on that list) you might guess that I like the Jurassic Park franchise.  Correct!  I will attend Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom when it opens this month and I will not be alone.  We all like dinosaurs.  They have it all: remarkable size, distinctive features, mystique and—best of all—they are dead.  Dinosaurs, unlike personalities or ideologies, are a piece of history that can not come back to threaten us. 
Or can they?
Ever since Michael Crichton published his novel, Jurassic Park, in 1990, people have been fascinated with the thought of using pre-historic DNA to bring dinosaurs back to life.  We have intact DNA from both Neanderthals and woolly mammoths.  So why not capture some of that DNA from dino-blood encapsulated in mosquitoes caught in amber?  The concept is intriguing, and an excellent fictional premise.  Crichton gets full marks for this gambit.  But, there is a deadly flaw.  Time.
The oldest known DNA is about a million years old.  To go back to DNA from dinosaurs we must back track at least another 66 million years.  The DNA in those mosquitoes is simply too degraded to be useful.  A single snip of DNA does not a dinosaur make.    
We do know the overall genomic structure of dinosaurs.  But that does not mean we know the DNA structure of specific animals (T-rex, for example).  Dinosaurs emerged about 240 million years ago.  They first show up in the Mesozoic era, which is divided into three periods (from oldest to youngest) the Triassic, Jurassic and Cretaceous.  That is much older than the intact DNA from woolly mammoths and Neanderthals that occur in the Pleistocene and Holocene periods of the Cenozoic era respectively.  To let you know just how recent that is, keep in mind that we live in the Holocene period ourselves.   
But even if we had a reasonable amount of dino-DNA, that still doesn’t equal a dinosaur.  Filling in the gaps in fragmented DNA with frog (or better still, bird)  DNA does not produce a dinosaur any more than a bird or a frog.
What is more, if you put this altered DNA into a non-dinosaur egg you have a further misalignment of events.  A strand of DNA does not spontaneously grow into its assigned creature.  There is a cascade of chemical interactions that cause certain genes to switch on and off at exactly the right time to trigger the creation of our little triceratops.  These chemical switches are unique to each egg.  People have tried putting chicken DNA into an ostrich egg to see what comes out.  The answer is nothing.  The magic of ostrich eggs only works for ostriches.  Chicken DNA dies in those eggs.  You may or may not be able to put woolly mammoth DNA into an elephant egg, but dinosaur DNA in any Cenozoic egg is an incredible stretch. 
If you really want to see living dinosaurs, look at the birds.  They are the remnants of the last great extinction of the dinosaurs at the end of the Mesozoic. If you want to create your own velociraptor—well—it isn’t going to happen any time soon.   
Life is a knowable and understandable miracle, but it is still a miracle.  Keep the faith.  

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Generation of Serfs

  On October 25, 1415, Henry V of England laid some serious hurt on the French at the Battle of Agincourt at Pas-de-Calais, France.   Part of the success of this campaign was due to Henry’s use of the longbow, but part of it also goes to the creative use of military indentures.   These legal contracts required all the English captains to provide specified amounts of men, material and time to the King’s cause.             An indenture was a document, written in duplicate and then torn along a jagged line, like little teeth ( dents ), in the paper.   One portion of the contract was in possession of each party and when the required conditions and period of service were fulfilled, the parts reunited, and the debt was considered paid.   Many of the people who first came to this country from England came as indentured servants, worked off their debt and became the backbone of the country.             Today we are creating a nation not of indentured servants, someone with a carefully
Read more

Our Beautiful Constitution and its Ugly Opponents

 The Constitution is our anchor of stability in a turbulent world!   We can withstand a bad President and a petulant Congress (for the short term, at least) because our Constitution both guides and limits.   If someone asked me to provide proof of a loving God, I would simply ask them how else so many geniuses in the matter of human governance could have been clustered together in the right time and place to create both our country and the means to govern it.    Our founding fathers had the vision to devise a way to not only govern themselves, but govern a country that they could not imagine, yet believed would prevail. The constitution of the United States is like a good parent.   It has allowed us to grow up as we have grown older, with the result that the United States of America is the oldest living democracy in the world.   The miracle of this document is that it lives, breathes and moves with the times.   The three branches of our government work together while standing alone
Read more

"You Didn't Build That:" Part I

Late in the day on Friday, July 13 th , President Obama mounted the stage of Historic Firehouse Number One in Roanoke , Virginia .   The room held around 800 people but it was hot and several people fainted.   In front of a carefully screened group of supporters he gave one of the most important speeches of his reelection campaign.    It was not meant to be a major speech.   That will come in the even more carefully scripted Convention Hall in Charlotte , North Carolina this September in front of adoring media and rabid political supporters.   But this speech in Roanoke is crucial to the 2012 election because on Friday, in Virginia , President Obama went off message.   Whether through error or hubris, he abandoned his script and spoke off the cuff.   And in so doing, he showed us the man behind the curtain.   The angry but controlled, insecure yet charismatic, market fearful, socialistically inclined man that Barrack Obama really is. I am speaking, of course, of the now famou
Read more