At Last: A Chance to Irritate Everybody.


The United States has a legal foreign born population of 42.5 million people.  God bless every one of them.   We also have slightly more than 11 million illegal aliens in this country.  Our problems are with this group, not our immigrants, so please do not talk about, “immigration” reform when you are really talking about illegal aliens.  [That is like calling a car thief a, “spontaneous entrepreneur.”  But I digress.]

            Getting rid of criminals entering our country illegally should be an aggressive goal and a human rights no-brainer.  But (BUT!!!) there are all of those children.  The fact is that almost 7 of every 100 students in U.S. schools are the children of illegals.  A significant number of these children were born in the United States and are, therefore, legal Americans themselves, even though their parents are not.  I am not ready to deport these children or separate them from their parents.  It would be inhumane, and against every principle of Christian charity that I claim.  I have stated in more than one column, going back to 2011 that I think the so called, “Dreamers” have a de facto if not de jure right to citizenship.  Children did not come here by there own choice, and the sins of the father should not be visited upon them.

But what about their parents?  What about the person who’s first act in coming to this country was to break the law?  How do we deal with them without backhanding the legal immigrant?  How do we make it perfectly clear that while humanity says you may stay, justice says you deserve punishment?  Can we serve two masters?  Yes.  But it is a hard choice.  I believe that if these illegals want to stay they must do so under severe punishment.  If they choose to stay, they will have all of the responsibilities but none of the rights of an American citizen.  They chose to circumvent our laws by coming here, and now they must reap as they have sown. 

If I were writing these laws, as Congress should, I would say that the adults who came here illegally shall never be United States citizens.  They may stay, but they must work, they must pay taxes and obey the law, but they shall have none of the rights of United States citizens.  They will receive no government assistance; no vote; no standing as citizens; only those protections we would provide for any human on our shores.  They will have legal protection.  They may receive help from private, charitable sources.  But they have no legal standing.  If they want to leave the country and start the legal immigration process from scratch, well, that is a different story.  But if they stay, as I believe they should be allowed to, they do so as a burden, not a guest.

Our finite resources should go to assimilating and aiding the legal immigrants that come to our shores.  As I have said many times, if you want to make room for illegals, I want you to also point to a map of the world and show me the country from which we are going to limit immigration so we can accommodate illegal aliens who are now going to be entered into our system.  Whom are we going to exclude?  What families are we going to delay, remove or reject?  Who gets a, “No” so others can be told, “Yes.”

You may have noticed that I have not mentioned President Obama and his message in this discussion.  There is a reason for that.  He is irrelevant.     

Don’t short change honest immigrants and keep the faith. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Generation of Serfs

  On October 25, 1415, Henry V of England laid some serious hurt on the French at the Battle of Agincourt at Pas-de-Calais, France.   Part of the success of this campaign was due to Henry’s use of the longbow, but part of it also goes to the creative use of military indentures.   These legal contracts required all the English captains to provide specified amounts of men, material and time to the King’s cause.             An indenture was a document, written in duplicate and then torn along a jagged line, like little teeth ( dents ), in the paper.   One portion of the contract was in possession of each party and when the required conditions and period of service were fulfilled, the parts reunited, and the debt was considered paid.   Many of the people who first came to this country from England came as indentured servants, worked off their debt and became the backbone of the country.             Today we are creating a nation not of indentured servants, someone with a carefully
Read more

Our Beautiful Constitution and its Ugly Opponents

 The Constitution is our anchor of stability in a turbulent world!   We can withstand a bad President and a petulant Congress (for the short term, at least) because our Constitution both guides and limits.   If someone asked me to provide proof of a loving God, I would simply ask them how else so many geniuses in the matter of human governance could have been clustered together in the right time and place to create both our country and the means to govern it.    Our founding fathers had the vision to devise a way to not only govern themselves, but govern a country that they could not imagine, yet believed would prevail. The constitution of the United States is like a good parent.   It has allowed us to grow up as we have grown older, with the result that the United States of America is the oldest living democracy in the world.   The miracle of this document is that it lives, breathes and moves with the times.   The three branches of our government work together while standing alone
Read more

"You Didn't Build That:" Part I

Late in the day on Friday, July 13 th , President Obama mounted the stage of Historic Firehouse Number One in Roanoke , Virginia .   The room held around 800 people but it was hot and several people fainted.   In front of a carefully screened group of supporters he gave one of the most important speeches of his reelection campaign.    It was not meant to be a major speech.   That will come in the even more carefully scripted Convention Hall in Charlotte , North Carolina this September in front of adoring media and rabid political supporters.   But this speech in Roanoke is crucial to the 2012 election because on Friday, in Virginia , President Obama went off message.   Whether through error or hubris, he abandoned his script and spoke off the cuff.   And in so doing, he showed us the man behind the curtain.   The angry but controlled, insecure yet charismatic, market fearful, socialistically inclined man that Barrack Obama really is. I am speaking, of course, of the now famou
Read more