Gun Laws, the 2nd Amendment and a Need For Change


I stand before you both chastened and ashamed.  I have lived with the assumption that my opinions about greater gun control were a matter of personal preference.  I did little to further gun control politically and simply assumed that right would win eventually.  My sins of omission became part of the problem.  I became part of the problem.  I choose not to follow that path any longer.  

Friends know that I am no gun lover.  I’m fine with hunting and have a grandmother’s pride in my grandson and granddaughter’s first deer kills.  But that is as far as my tolerance goes.  I don’t understand the preoccupation with hand guns and see absolutely no need for semi-automatic weapons.  If the only purpose of a gun is to murder human beings, I am quite certain that the world is better off without it. 

We have too many guns in this country.  Here are a few examples of how a few civilized, educated, culturally sophisticated countries stack up on gun ownership:

United States:       89 firearms per 100 citizens (!!!)

            Germany:               30 firearms per 100 citizens

            Australia:               15 firearms per 100 citizens

            United Kingdom:   7 firearms per 100 citizens

            Japan:                    >1 firearm per 100 citizens

            So what does all this fire power get us?  To begin with, 2/3 of all murders in this country are committed with a gun.  Over 17,000 suicides are likewise accomplished with a gun.  We have 15 x’s more homicides than other wealthy, industrialized, first world countries.  Why?  Because a gun increases a killers efficacy disproportionate to his will to murder.   A man that must kill with his hands, with a rock, even with a knife is limited by his strength, agility and emotional commitment to end another life.  A gun takes all but one of those requirements out of the equation. 

            An example of the difference strict gun laws make comes from Australia.  After a massacre in 1996 Australia, not wanting what they called the, “American disease” to come to their shores enacted even stricter gun laws than were already in place.  They have had not a single incident of mass shootings since.  I could site similar data from other countries.  They all point to the same thing.  If you take away the means of mass destruction, you don’t have as many incidents of mass destruction.  Japan has around 12 shootings per year; in the United States the number is 12,000!  To get a gun in Japan you have to attend a full day of classes and pass a written test; attend and pass another day of classes at a shooting range;  pass a mental and drug test at a hospital; and then pass a background check that includes criminal records, and association with criminal or extremist groups.  Does this work?  Obviously it must.  They have a high of 22 dead bodies in a year; we have more than that on one terrible day.     

            I have been distressed by the number of people promulgating the idea that teachers with guns would have solved Sandy Hook’s problems.  Somehow the idea of two people exchanging gun fire in the middle of an elementary school seems like the solution to a problem.  This and the anecdotal evidence they use to support their position ignore the fact that while two guns might be better than one, zero guns is better than two!  We have got to get rid of semi-automatic weapons, and their ammunition.  I will not support a single candidate for office who does not endorse this position.

            You’ve got to live your faith to keep the faith. 

           

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Generation of Serfs

  On October 25, 1415, Henry V of England laid some serious hurt on the French at the Battle of Agincourt at Pas-de-Calais, France.   Part of the success of this campaign was due to Henry’s use of the longbow, but part of it also goes to the creative use of military indentures.   These legal contracts required all the English captains to provide specified amounts of men, material and time to the King’s cause.             An indenture was a document, written in duplicate and then torn along a jagged line, like little teeth ( dents ), in the paper.   One portion of the contract was in possession of each party and when the required conditions and period of service were fulfilled, the parts reunited, and the debt was considered paid.   Many of the people who first came to this country from England came as indentured servants, worked off their debt and became the backbone of the country.             Today we are creating a nation not of indentured servants, someone with a carefully
Read more

Our Beautiful Constitution and its Ugly Opponents

 The Constitution is our anchor of stability in a turbulent world!   We can withstand a bad President and a petulant Congress (for the short term, at least) because our Constitution both guides and limits.   If someone asked me to provide proof of a loving God, I would simply ask them how else so many geniuses in the matter of human governance could have been clustered together in the right time and place to create both our country and the means to govern it.    Our founding fathers had the vision to devise a way to not only govern themselves, but govern a country that they could not imagine, yet believed would prevail. The constitution of the United States is like a good parent.   It has allowed us to grow up as we have grown older, with the result that the United States of America is the oldest living democracy in the world.   The miracle of this document is that it lives, breathes and moves with the times.   The three branches of our government work together while standing alone
Read more

"You Didn't Build That:" Part I

Late in the day on Friday, July 13 th , President Obama mounted the stage of Historic Firehouse Number One in Roanoke , Virginia .   The room held around 800 people but it was hot and several people fainted.   In front of a carefully screened group of supporters he gave one of the most important speeches of his reelection campaign.    It was not meant to be a major speech.   That will come in the even more carefully scripted Convention Hall in Charlotte , North Carolina this September in front of adoring media and rabid political supporters.   But this speech in Roanoke is crucial to the 2012 election because on Friday, in Virginia , President Obama went off message.   Whether through error or hubris, he abandoned his script and spoke off the cuff.   And in so doing, he showed us the man behind the curtain.   The angry but controlled, insecure yet charismatic, market fearful, socialistically inclined man that Barrack Obama really is. I am speaking, of course, of the now famou
Read more